🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of nations are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' youth". The policy could be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Officials have suggested that an similar ban is "a potential measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged parliament to enact a proposal lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a similar action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged families to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding motion supporting a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is provided. While it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"An effective age limit is a good foundation," commented one parliamentarian supporting the resolution.

The UK: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any action must be "based on strong data".

Earlier, interest built behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the administration committed to further research the topic.

Charities have raised apprehensions. One foundation established by the loved ones of a girl who died after encountering harmful social media material contends that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for children," stated a influential peer.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, regulation is primarily unfolding at the local government level amid federal stalemate.

• Utah demands guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a rule limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further time needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced bills mandating adult authorization for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and calls from certain figures to mimic the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, other nations are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international organizations adopt a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could backfire". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this global debate unfolds, the policies of the Australian government and others indicate that states globally are increasingly content to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.