🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has stated it is pursuing damages totaling $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This action is a clear warning from the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize immobilized Russian state funds to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

According to accounts in local news outlets, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This sum corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

EU leaders are set to decide in the coming days regarding a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. This scheme involves granting Ukraine with a large loan to fund its military and economic needs.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the primary keeper for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

European Union officials have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was frozen in EU countries following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has labeled any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened reciprocal actions, such as confiscating EU corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a prominent role in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the proposal as "a vicious attack on property rights and the international reserves system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the latest legal action. It has previously stated it is facing more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although judges in EU countries are unlikely to enforce rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue enforcement in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, provided that relevant assets can be identified," stated a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are developing measures to discourage other nations from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European companies. Additionally, they are designing protections to protect EU countries with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex plan, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.

Ukraine would solely be obligated to return the loan if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense destruction caused during the ongoing war.

Other Funding Ideas

Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This entails common EU debt issuance to fund a loan, using unused funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also important," she remarked. "It also sends a powerful signal that if you cause all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."